Corrections and updates

We want a documented way for brands, operators, and readers to challenge errors. The correction path matters because this site is making credibility claims about diligence. Without a correction process, those claims are incomplete.

What qualifies for review

• A factual error such as a wrong entity name, product category, state, or date.
• A stronger source that materially changes the conclusion or wording of a page.
• A disclosure failure where a commercial relationship is not labeled clearly enough.
• A stale page where material information is outdated and should be revised or removed.

What helps us process a request faster

• The page URL.
• The sentence or claim that should be reviewed.
• The strongest evidence you can provide.
• An explanation of whether the issue is factual, contextual, or disclosure-related.

How we handle it

We prefer to revise the page itself rather than hiding behind a vague note. When a correction is accepted, the page carries the corrected wording and a revision date that moved because the content moved. If the evidence is not conclusive, we may narrow the claim rather than simply replacing it with a new overstatement.