Corrections and updates

We want a documented way for brands, operators, and readers to challenge errors. The correction path matters because this site is making credibility claims about diligence. Without a correction process, those claims are incomplete.

What qualifies for review

• A factual error such as a wrong entity name, product category, state, or date.
• A stronger source that materially changes the conclusion or wording of a page.
• A disclosure failure where a commercial relationship is not labeled clearly enough.
• A stale page where material information is outdated and should be revised or removed.

What helps us process a request faster

• The page URL.
• The sentence or claim that should be reviewed.
• The strongest evidence you can provide.
• An explanation of whether the issue is factual, contextual, or disclosure-related.

How we handle it

We prefer to revise the page itself rather than hiding behind a vague note. If a correction is accepted, the page should reflect the updated wording and the revision date should be meaningful. If the evidence is not conclusive, we may narrow the claim rather than simply replacing it with a new overstatement.